39 Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy PDF 147 KB
Members are asked to
note that this item is due to be pre-scrutinised at a meeting of
the Overview and Scrutiny Committee scheduled to take place on
14th October 2024. Any
recommendations arising from that meeting on this subject will be
tabled for Members’ consideration at the Executive Committee
meeting.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Specialist Lead Officer
(Contaminated Land) from Worcestershire Regulatory Services (WRS)
presented the Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy. It was
explained that six Districts across Worcestershire would be looked
at as part of the review, although not in any particular order. It
was noted, however, that the Redditch Borough review was the first
area to undertake such a review due to the number of contaminated
land sites within the Borough.
During the presentation of the report
the following was highlighted:
- Part 2A of the Environmental
Protection Act 1990 placed a duty on local authorities to review
and assess risks through the contaminated land regime and that from
time to time, Local Authorities could cause their area to be
inspected in order to ensure that this regime was being adhered to.
The term ‘Contaminated Land’ covered a range of sites
including petrol stations, factories, depots and launderettes. The
presence of a harmful substance did not mean that land would meet
the definition of “contaminated land”. However, it was
reported that a very high bar must be met in order to deem it as
not contaminated.
- Statutory guidance stated that
action under contaminated land legislation should only be used when
there was no other appropriate alternative. These included the
planning and development control processes, as well as
voluntary action taken by landowners to minimise the unnecessary
burdens placed on taxpayers, businesses, and individuals.
- The new strategy had been amended in
order to reflect the gradual reduction and withdrawal of central
Government funding for Local Authority contaminated land work. It
also outlined the inspection process, and the methodology
applied.
- The strategy did not change the
statutory responsibilities, and Local Authorities still had to
adhere to the current statutory guidance.
- There were nine thousand three
hundred contaminated land sites across Worcestershire and seven
hundred and fifty of these were located in Redditch. This would
result in a large number of inspections and investigations being
carried out.
Following the presentation, the
Leader thanked Officers for their detailed report and explained
that it was clearly presented and therefore had allayed some
concerns that had been previously raised.
Members raised questions in respect
of some areas of the report, as follows:
- Who was the responsible party when
it came to remediation of contaminated land sites? - It was
explained that this would be on a site-specific basis. In some
cases, it might be the Council, however, the owner or a purchaser
of a site might also be responsible.
- Was the process of assessing
contaminated land sites subject to quality assurance? – It
was reported that there was detailed guidance and best practice
guidelines in respect of this. Often these reports would be peer
reviewed in order to ensure that the correct process had been
undertaken. It was explained that there was a significant amount of
expertise within WRS in this matter and that this level of
expertise would be utilised when undertaking these kinds of
inspections. This was particularly important as contaminated land
site reports were usually ...
view the full minutes text for item 39