Issue - meetings

Neighbourhood Group Task and Finish Group - Draft Report

Meeting: 25/11/2009 - Overview and Scrutiny (Item 121)

121 Neighbourhood Group Task and Finish Group - Draft Report pdf icon PDF 191 KB

To consider the draft final report and recommendations from the Neighbourhood Groups Task and Finish Group.

 

(Report to follow).

Minutes:

The Chair of the Neighbourhood Groups Task and Finish Group introduced the final draft report of the Task and Finish Group.

 

The Committee was informed that the main objective of the review was to determine whether the Neighbourhood Groups were operating in accordance with their purpose and to consider alternative methods of consultation.

 

Members were informed that the purpose of Neighbourhood Groups when they were set up was to inform, engage and consult with residents about Council business, policy development and decision making.

 

Following consultation with Councillors, Officers, Police and residents the Task and Finish Group concluded that Neighbourhood Groups were no longer fit for purpose. 

 

Information regarding the Task and Finish Group’s initial findings had been circulated to all residents on the contact list for the Neighbourhood Groups.  Members of the Task and Finish Group also attended all Neighbourhood Group meetings in October 2009 to receive feedback on their initial findings.

 

Evidence provided to the Group had indicated that there was a lot of duplication over the types of issues considered at Neighbourhood Group meetings and at Partners and Communities Together (PACT) meetings.  Many residents considered that PACT meetings were more effective at addressing and resolving issues.

As a result of consultation with West Mercia Police it was suggested that PACT meetings might be re-launched as the primary local meeting for engaging with residents and could include other partners, when necessary.

 

Members of the Committee felt that generally PACT meetings were worked better than Neighbourhood Groups.  They recognised that Neighbourhood Groups had outlived their usefulness and were very expensive to run.  They also felt it important that alternative methods of engaging with a wider cross section of the community be implemented.

 

RECOMMENDED that

 

1)                 the Neighbourhood Groups are not now fit for purpose and should be discontinued;

2)                 the Partners and Communities Together (PACT) group meetings should be re-launched and delivered as an equal partnership arrangement;

 

a)                 Redditch Borough Council should work with the Police and other local agencies participating in Partners and Communities Together (PACT) to agree funding and administration for PACT meetings;

b)                 a protocol should be jointly developed outlining the roles and responsibilities of all agencies in the re-launched PACT Groups;

c)                 the Chairs of all PACT meetings should be independent members of the community;

d)                 promotion of the re-launched PACT meetings should be appropriately targeted towards clarifying the meaning of the new arrangements for residents living in areas where PACT and Neighbourhood Group meetings currently only take place on the same night;

e)                 there should be small, local budgets for each of the re-launched PACT groups which could be spent at the discretion of the group;

 

3)                 the Neighbourhood Groups also be replaced with a further variety of methods that will enable Redditch Borough Council to inform and consult more effectively with local residents;

these alternative methods should include the following;

 

a)                 the Council should publish quarterly editions of Redditch Matters during the year to inform residents about  ...  view the full minutes text for item 121