35 Shared Service Business Case - Building Control
To consider a referral from the Shared Service Board regarding the Building Control Shared Service Business Case.
[The report may contain exempt information as defined in S.100 of the Local Government Act 1972, as amended by the Local Government (Access to Information) (Variation) Order 2006, as they may contain information relating to contemplated consultations or negotiations in connection with labour relation matters arising between the authority and employees of the authority. In view of this it is anticipated that discussion of these matters will take place after the exclusion of the public.]
(Report attached – minutes of the meeting of the Shared Services Board to follow.)
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee received a report on the Shared Services Business Case – Building Control to provide a shared service for Bromsgrove District Council, Redditch Borough Council and Wyre Forest District Council, which had been considered by the Shared Services Board on 30th June 2011.
Members noted the recommendations of the Shared Services Board.
RECOMMENDED that
1)
in accordance with the agreed PID dated
9th December 2010, the three partner Councils proceed
with the creation of the shared service in accordance with
recommendation 6 of the report: the delivery of Shared Building
Control Services, provided by a single Team, hosted by Bromsgrove
District Council;
2)
implementation costs be shared on the
same basis as the total revised service costs amongst the three
Councils to reflect the percentage of the initial budget allocation
into the service (as detailed at Appendix 5 to the report); this to
be subject to final financial agreements being in place between the
partner authorities; and
3)
the new service be
known as ‘NorthWorcestershireBuilding Control’
and use a service specific logo and document templates, the design
of which is to be formally agreed before the completion of this
project.
(During consideration of this item Members discussed matters that necessitated the disclosure of exempt information. It was therefore agreed to exclude the press and public prior to any debate on the grounds that information would be revealed relating to consultations or negotiations, or contemplated consultations or negotiations in connection with labour relations matters arising between the authority and employees of, the authority. However, there is nothing exempt in this record of the proceedings.)