To approve the Initial Estimates for 2010/11 and Forecasts for 2011/12 and 2012/13.
(Report attached)
Decision:
RECOMMENDED that
1) the Initial Estimates for 2010/11 be approved;
2) the Revenue Bids categorised as unavoidable and high detailed in Appendix 14 be approved , as follows:
2010/11 £279,210
2011/12 £ 98,210
2012/13 £ 97,210
3) The General Fund bids for capital resources categorised as high set out in Appendix 15 be approved, as follows:
2010/11 £325,000
2011/12 £165,000
2012/13 £845,000;
together with the associated revenue implications as follows:
2010/11 £ 6,500
2011/12 £54,200
2012/13 £96,400
Future years £188,800;
4) the proposal for how the Further Support for Town Centre Grant is utilised as set out in Appendix 18 be approved;
5) the bids as recommended by Overview and Scrutiny Committee be approved as follows:
a) 2nd December 2009 Redditch Matters to be published quarterly. Cost of an additional edition £6,000;
6) the bid for Church Hill District Centre Redevelopment for £60,000 2010/11 which was approved in principle at Council on 7th December 2009, be approved;
7) that any
Direct Action - Enforcement expenditure be funded from balances,
pending recovery from the third party, and officers report back to
Members on the success of any recovery action;
8) that any
bids not approved at this stage be brought back to this Committee
for reconsideration once the outturn position for 2009/10 is known
and
9) the bid
of £6,000 for the repair and maintenance of street lighting
be included in the Initial Estimates 2010/11.
(Officers to write, in the first instance, to Worcestershire County Council highlighting the increasing pressure on the Council’s budgets for staff pensions.)
Minutes:
Members received a report which presented the estimates at Directorate level that had been prepared in accordance with the Budget Guidelines, which had been approved by Council on 7th December 2009.
The Head of Resources reported that since consideration of the Medium Term Financial Plan for the period 2010/11 to 2012/13 in July 2009 central government had announced an increase in National Insurance contributions to take effect from April 2011 at an estimated cost of £110k. She also reported that there had been a reduction in income form business centres, leisure services, local land charges and planning fees.
Members were informed that the Executive Committee at their meeting on 18th November 2009 had considered a number of revenue and capital bids. Members had approved the bids for 2009/10 and approved, in principle, the bids for the forthcoming three years, subject to the availability of resources. Following the outcome of the Initial Estimates process for 2010/11 the Strategic Management Team had reviewed the General Fund bids. As a result the following amendments had been made:
1)
the bid for £110,000 for works to Public Building had been
removed pending a further report to Members;
2)
the bid for the repair and maintenance of street lighting had been
changed to medium priority and would be reconsidered later in the
year;
3)
the bid for Landscape Maintenance had been changed to medium
priority pending an investigation into the potential utilisation of
Section 106 contributions to support the budget;
4)
the bid for Direct Action –
Enforcement had been removed from the list.
5)
the capital bid for the Energy
Management System had been removed form the list as it had been
included in the list of projects for SALIX funding.
The Leader reported that, with the approval of Members, the bid for the repair and maintenance of street lighting at a cost of £6,000 would be included in the Initial Estimates 2010/11.
The Head of Resources reported that the Secretary of State had approved the Council’s application for a Capitalisation Direction in respect of the severance costs associated with the Single Management Team. She explained that this would mean that the severance costs could be met from capital receipts as opposed to a direct charge to the General Fund revenue account.
Officers were asked to write, in the first instance, to Worcestershire County Council highlighting the increasing pressure on the Council’s budgets for staff pensions.
RECOMMENDED that
1) the Initial Estimates for 2010/11 be approved;
2) the Revenue Bids categorised as unavoidable and high detailed in Appendix 14 be approved , as follows:
2010/11 £279,210
2011/12 £ 98,210
2012/13 £ 97,210
3) The General Fund bids for capital resources categorised as high set out in Appendix 15 be approved, as follows:
2010/11 £325,000
2011/12 £165,000
2012/13 £845,000;
together with the associated revenue implications as follows:
2010/11 £ 6,500
2011/12 £54,200
2012/13 £96,400
Future years £188,800;
4) the proposal for how the Further Support for Town Centre Grant is utilised as set out in Appendix 17 be approved;
5) the bids as recommended by Overview and Scrutiny Committee be approved as follows:
a) 2nd December 2009Redditch Matters to be published quarterly. Cost of an additional edition £6,000;
6) the bid for Church Hill District Centre Redevelopment for £60,000 2010/11 which was approved in principle at Council on 7th December 2009, be approved;
7)
that any Direct Action - Enforcement
expenditure be funded from balances, pending recovery from the
third party, and officers report back to Members on the success of
any recovery action;
8) that any
bids not approved at this stage be brought back to this Committee
for reconsideration once the outturn position for 2009/10 is known
and
9)
the bid of £6,000 for the repair
and maintenance of street lighting be included in the Initial
Estimates 2010/11.
(This report had been accepted as a matter of Urgent Business – not having met the publication deadline and was considered at the meeting as such, with the approval of the Chair, and in accordance with the Council’s constitutional rules and powers vested in the Chair by virtue of Section 100 (B) (4) (b) of the Local Government Act 1972 to agree matters of urgency being discussed by reason of special circumstances.
In this case the special circumstances were that the information, which was not available at the time of the agenda going to print, was required to be considered at the present meeting in order to meet statutory requirements.)
Supporting documents: