Agenda and minutes

Overview and Scrutiny - Tuesday, 4th March, 2014 7.00 pm

Venue: Committee Room 2 Town Hall

Contact: J Bayley  Democratic Services Officer

Items
No. Item

107.

Apologies and named substitutes

To receive apologies for absence and details of any Councillor (or co-optee substitute) nominated to attend this meeting in place of a member of this Committee.

Minutes:

An apology for absence was received from Councillor Simon Chalk.  Councillor Roger Bennett attended the meeting as his substitute.

 

108.

Declarations of interest and of Party Whip

To invite Councillors to declare any Disclosable Pecuniary Interests or Other Disclosable Interests they may have in items on the agenda, and to confirm the nature of those interests, and any Party Whip.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest nor of any party whip.

 

The Executive Director, Finance and Corporate Resources declared an other disclosable interest in respect of Item 9, Task Group Progress Reports (b) Football Task Group.  She left the room during the delivery of this update and took no part in the discussions about this item.

 

109.

Minutes pdf icon PDF 265 KB

To confirm the minutes of the most recent meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee as a correct record.

 

(Minutes attached)

Minutes:

RESOLVED that

 

the minutes of the meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee held on 4th February 2014 be confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chair.

 

110.

Dial A Ride - Monitoring Update Report pdf icon PDF 85 KB

To receive a report detailing the impact of group hire arrangements in use of Dial a Ride Vehicles on participation in community activities.

 

(Members are asked to note that this vehicle hire arrangement was introduced n line with proposals made by the Youth Services Provision Task Group in 2012).

 

(Report attached)

Minutes:

Officers presented the report on Dial A Ride Extended Service Monitoring and reminded Members that provision of the Dial A Ride vehicles out of standard operating hours for the service had followed a recommendation from the Youth Services Provision Task Group in 2012.  In particular, Members had felt that use of the vehicles out of standard operating hours would provide a useful means of transport for young people. The following points were raised:

 

·                The service had been dependent upon the good will of the drivers working outside of their contracted hours.

·                Seven trips had been carried out over a 12 month period.  This had included use by Leisure Services, the Redditch Older Peoples Forum and Environmental Services.

·                Dial A Ride had obtained approximately £2,000 from the service.

 

Officers confirmed that the service was provided outside of the normal Dial A Ride operating hours which were Monday to Friday.  In the future Officers hoped to be able to attract youth organisations and encourage them to use the service.   Members discussed the following areas in more detail:

 

·                The use of the service for sheltered housing schemes and in particular Mendip House.

·                Promotion of the scheme to other organisations for example Scouts Groups.

·                How the financial costs of a trip were calculated.  Officers confirmed that this calculation was made in accordance with the drivers’ hourly rate, fuel costs, a sum for wear and tear on the vehicle and a small fee to cover administration costs.

·                The vehicles available were a 6 x 9 seater and 1 x 14 seater all of which provided disabled access.

 

RESOLVED that

 

the Dial A Ride Extended Service Monitoring Report be noted.

 

111.

Threadneedle House - Information Report

To consider further information about the sale arrangements for Threadneedle House.

 

(Presentation to follow)

Minutes:

The Committee received a presentation in respect of the sales arrangements for Threadneedle House following a request from the Committee at its previous meeting.  Officers provided background information and informed Members that there was a void rate across Redditch of commercial office space estimated at between 25-30%. 

 

The following areas were highlighted within the presentation and discussed by Members:

 

·                Confirmation that Barclays bank had first discussed surrendering its lease in 2012 and the loss of income following the surrender.

·                The financial benefits to receiving revenue included within the Medium Term Financial Plan.

·                The assumption which had been made in respect of staff moving from Bromsgrove District Council into the vacant property and the income that could be generated from it.

·                The impact of the empty unit and the refurbishment costs and the negotiated dilapidations sum received.

·                Members questioned the valuation of the building and in particular the reduction in value when considered as an empty building and the calculation of the current value.

·                The impact on business rates in respect of short term lets to charitable organisations.

·                The area of the unit let to the Post Office and the continued rental received from this together with the number of years remaining on the lease and any formal discussions with them in respect of the possible sale of the unit.

·                Members expressed concerns as to whether a developer would be happy for the Post Office to be retained in its current position.  Members were keen to ensure that it remained in that position.

·                A comparison in the rate of rental units per square foot in various parts of the Borough.

·                The reduction in demand for large unit spaces and the length of leases available.

·                The reference within the Local Plan in respect of the need for office space within the Borough.

·                Tentative interest shown from organisations such as the NHS and the Police Authority.

·                How the units were currently being marketed.

·                The shortfall of housing within the Borough and the possible conversion to residential use (it was suggested that the ground floor should be retail with residential above) and any interest from developers.

·                The impact of residential use on the surrounding area and car parking issues which may arise from such a development.

·                It was confirmed that the market area would not initially be included within any negotiations.

 

Members were informed that Threadneedle House would be marketed nationally as it was felt that a national group would have more appropriate contacts and cover a wider scope of potential developers.  Local commercial agents tended to deal with much smaller units.  Quotes had already been received and discussions had taken place in respect of guidelines and strategies in respect of potential bidders.  Members were also provided with details of the potential fees charged for the sale of the building.  There would be a guide price and an auction would be considered as an option.  A final decision would be made following consideration of all the available professional advice.  It was confirmed by Officers  ...  view the full minutes text for item 111.

112.

Draft Overview and Scrutiny Annual Report 2013/14 pdf icon PDF 4 MB

To consider and, where appropriate to agree any proposed changes to the draft Overview and Scrutiny Annual Report detailing the achievements of the Committee and Task Groups during the year. 

 

Members are asked to note that three gaps have been left in the report which will be filled with photographs that are due to be taken in March 2014.

 

(Subject to any amendments made during this meeting, the final version of the annual report is due to be presented by the Chair at a meeting of full Council on 31st March 2014).

 

(Draft report attached)

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Officers informed the Committee that the draft Overview and Scrutiny Annual Report contained details of the work of the Committee and the Task Groups carried out during the past 12 months and that it would be presented to Council at the meeting to be held on 31st March 2014 by the Chair of the Committee.  It should be noted that there were additional photographs to be included prior to this presentation.  The report recognised that a number of the Task Groups were continuing.  It was noted that the photograph of Councillor Fry was slightly distorted and required adjustment.

 

The Chair thanked both Members of the Committee and Officers for their continued support with special recognition being given to Jess Bayley, Democratic Services Officer.

 

RESOLVED that

 

subject to the changes detailed above, the Overview and Scrutiny Annual Report be submitted for the consideration of Council on 31st March 2014.

113.

Executive Committee Minutes and Scrutiny of the Executive Committee's Work Programme pdf icon PDF 127 KB

To consider the minutes of the latest meeting(s) of the Executive Committee and also to consider whether any items on the Executive Committee’s Work Programme are suitable for scrutiny.

(Minutes from 24th February and Executive Work Programme attached).

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Committee received the minutes if the Executive Committee meetings held on 11th and 24th February 2014 together with the most recent edition of the Executive Work Programme.

 

RESOLVED that

 

the minutes of the Executive Committee held on 11th and 24th February 2014 and the latest edition of the Executive Committee Work Programme be noted.

114.

Overview and Scrutiny Work Programme pdf icon PDF 184 KB

To consider the Committee’s current Work Programme, and potential items for addition to the list arising from:

  • The Forward Plan / Committee agendas
  • External publications
  • Other sources.

(Report attached)

 

Minutes:

Councillor Gandy requested to bring forward an item on the subject of Members’ IT.  She informed Members that following a recent Task Group meeting it was apparent that a number of Members were experiencing similar problems and that in many cases these had not been report or Members had made alternative arrangements and therefore the IT Team were not aware of any issues.

 

Councillor Gandy did not believe that a Task Group was required to investigate this matte further, but that a presentation from the Head of Service together with a representative from the IT Team would be helpful.  This would also be an opportunity for the IT Team to bring Members up to date with the forthcoming changes in respect of the PSN Secure Network implementation and the move towards the use of Ipads. 

 

Particular areas of concern raised by Members were:

 

·                Any relevant training and support that would be provided in respect of Ipads.

·                The role out of Ipads.

·                Appropriate IT for new Members.

·                The process of reporting problems to the IT Helpdesk.

 

Those Members who already had the use of an Ipad commented on how useful they were and the improvements they had found when compared to previous equipment with which they had been issued.  Councillor Bennett informed the Committee that he was a member of the Member Development Steering Group and at its last meeting the use of Ipads and the PSN Secure Network, which was an initiative from Central Government, had been discussed.

 

Following further discussion it was agreed that Officers would contact all Members for information about their IT needs and experiences and compile a list of issues that were raised prior to the meeting in order to give the IT Team an opportunity to prepare responses and focus their presentation.

 

RESOLVED that

 

1)        the Committee receive a presentation from the Head of Business Transformation and a representative from the IT team as detailed in the preamble above at the meeting to be held on 1st April 2014;

2)        Officers to canvass all Members and compile a list of problems which have been raised; and

3)        the Work Programme be noted subject to the inclusion of the above.

115.

Task Groups - Progress Reports pdf icon PDF 61 KB

To consider progress to date on the current reviews against the terms set by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee.

 

The current reviews in progress are:

 

a)        Abbey Stadium Task Group – Chair, Councillor Gandy;

 

b)        Football Task Group – Chair, Councillor Bush;

 

c)         Joint WRS Scrutiny Review – lead Member, Councillor Mason;

 

d)        Landscaping Task Group – Chair, Councillor Hopkins; and

 

e)        Voluntary Sector Task Group – Chair, Councillor Witherspoon.

 

 (Verbal reports to follow and one written update attached)

Minutes:

The following updates in respect of current Task Group reviews were provided:

 

a)        Abbey Stadium Task Group – Chair, Councillor Carole Gandy

 

Councillor Gandy informed Members that the group had visited Stratford Leisure Centre which had been an interesting and useful visit and a good comparison to the visit they had made to Evesham Leisure Centre.  The group had also interviewed Councillor Mould as Portfolio for Leisure and Tourism and discussed with him the plans for the Abbey Stadium and the forthcoming business case. 

 

At a subsequent meeting Officers from Human Resources had been interviewed in respect of employment opportunities at the venue.  The group had also interviewed an apprentice working within the Democratic and Legal Services team to get an inside view of the support she was receiving and why she had chosen to take up an apprenticeship.

 

b)        Football Provision within the Borough Task Group – Chair, Councillor David Bush

 

Councillor Bush raised concerns in respect of comments which had been made at the full Council meeting on 24th February 2014 by some Councillors.  Councillor Bush’s understanding of these comments in respect of Redditch United Football Club (RUFC) was that a decision had been made and that the work of the Task Group was unnecessary. 

 

Members discussed how the Task Group’s terms of reference covered football provision and its availability throughout the Borough and that consideration of RUFC was simply an element of the work being carried out.  Officers confirmed that a decision had been made at a meeting of the Executive Committee in November 2013, but that due process was being followed and any recommendations from the Task Group would be considered within that process.  However, Officers currently had no mandate to take any further action.

 

Councillor Fry informed Members that no decision, other than that made by the Executive Committee in November 2013, had been made and that the Council was awaiting the outcome of the Task Group.  Councillor Bush expressed concerns that two Portfolio Holders had made public statements, which he believed were to the detriment of the work of the Task Group.  It was confirmed that this matter would be discussed further at the next meeting.

 

Councillor Bush informed Members that from the meetings that had already been held the work of the Task Group had been very productive.  Members had interviewed relevant Officers from leisure services, including senior Officers.  Concerns had been raised in respect of football access throughout the Borough and Members had gained an understanding of issues in respect of pitch size and the requirements of both the Football Association (FA) and Football League.  The Task Group had also received a presentation from RUFC which had highlighted a major issue in respect of insufficient playing facilities and playing less time on the pitches.  The Design Team appointed by RUFC had also been in attendance and had highlighted that they were unable to share the concerns raised in respect of the roundabout for the proposed new site, which would be taken forward.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 115.

116.

Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee

To receive a verbal update on the recent work of the Worcestershire Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee.

 

(Verbal report)

Minutes:

Councillor Witherspoon informed Members that the main topic at the last meeting of the Worcestershire Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee (HOSC) had been in respect of the plans for urgent care.  Members present had been made aware that this would be going out to consultation with three events being held in Redditch and three in Bromsgrove.  Members of the HOSC had not been happy with the document provided; it contained lots of acronyms, which many people had found difficult to understand, and there had been several complaints about the general language used within the document.  The HOSC had asked that the document be reviewed after taking on board the comments received from Members.

 

The GP Ambulance service had also been discussed and concerns continued to be raised and which needed to be taken up by the Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs).   There had also been a further incident on the Bromsgrove Highway bridge and concerns had been raised again in respect of this.  It was understood that the notices mentioned at a previous meeting had in fact been installed at the instigation of the local Community Safety Team, but there remained concern that this was not sufficient action.  The Chair of HOSC had written to the Health and Wellbeing Board asking for this issue to be given further consideration.  There had also been a similar incident in a different area and the cost of such incidents had been raised.

 

There had been limited discussion about the future of the Alexandra Hospital although this would be going out to further consultation shortly.

117.

Exclusion of the Press and Public

Should it be necessary, in the opinion of the Borough Director, during the course of the meeting to consider excluding the public from the meeting on the grounds that exempt information is likely to be divulged, it may be necessary to move the following resolution:

“That, under S.100 (A) (4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting for the following matter(s) on the grounds that it/they involve(s) the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in the relevant paragraphs (to be specified) of Part 1 of Schedule 12 (A) of the said Act”.

 

These paragraphs are as follows:

Subject to the “public interest” test, information relating to:

·         Para 1 – any individual;

·         Para 2 – the identity of any individual;

·         Para 3 – financial or business affairs;

·         Para 4 – labour relations matters;

·         Para 5 – legal professional privilege;

·         Para 6   a notice, order or direction;

·         Para 7 – the prevention, investigation or

                     prosecution of crime;

                     and may need to be considered as ‘exempt’.

 

Minutes:

RESOLVED that

 

Under S.100 I of the Local Government Act 1972, as amended by the Local Government (Access to Information) (Variation) Order 2006, the public be excluded from the meeting for the following matter on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in the relevant paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12(A) of the said Act, as amended, in respect of Threadneedle House – Information Report (as detailed in Minute 111 above).